The Revenge of the Nerds is Living Well
<p>Grant McCracken has argued in his book <a href='http://www.cultureby.com/books/plenit/cxc_trilogy_plenitude.html'> Plenitude</a> that one of the defining characteristics of the last fifty years is an explosion of subcultural variety &mdash; people creating new lifestyles and new identities around occupations, sexual tastes, hobbies, genres of art and music, religions, and just about any other investment of time human beings have ever dreamed up.</p>
<p>When McCracken proposes that there is now as much divergence among individual subcultures in the life of the modern West as we can find among preindustrial tribes in the annals of anthropology he is probably exaggerating.  Nevertheless, it is clear that he is onto something when he observes that the old idea of a &#8216;mainstream&#8217; culture with subcultures developing in anti-conformist reaction to it is falling apart.</p>
<blockquote><p>
[S]ubcultures now come from the cultural system in place. The culture of<br />
commotion is, as I have labored to demonstrate, dedicated to the production<br />
of new and different subcultures.
</p></blockquote>
<p>SF fans.  Skatepunks.  Polyamorists.  Gangsta rappers.  Goths. McCracken certainly has this much right; there are now lots of voluntary subcultures out there that have the kind of adhesiveness once only associated with religious or tribal groupings.  Belonging to them is not just a  predilection like being a baseball fan or liking Chinese food, but a statement of identity with a whole social network and a set of myths and dreams and heroes attached to it.</p>
<p>Among the five groups I listed more or less at random above  the culture of SF fandom is a bearded grandaddy, dating back to the late 1930s and thus predating the beginnings of the modern explosion of plenitude in the 1960s.  The others are all much more recent, and illustrate how new tribes can emerge to become apparently permanent features of the landscape in less than a decade.</p>
<p>And this brings us to the geeks.  When I was a teenager in the 1970s, there was not yet anything you could call &#8220;geek culture&#8221;. Sure, there were bright kids fascinated by computers or math or science, kids who were often <q>poorly socialized</q> in the jargon of the day and hung together as a defensive measure; I was one of them. But we didn&#8217;t see ourselves as having a social identity or affiliation the way the jocks or surfers or hippies did.  We weren&#8217;t a subculture, nor even a community; we didn&#8217;t even have a label for ourselves.</p>
<p>Slowly, slowly that began to change.  One key event was the eruption of science fiction into pop culture that began with the first Star Wars movie in 1977.  This was our stuff and we knew it, even though most of us never joined the subculture of SF fandom proper. Personal computers made another big difference after 1980; suddenly, technology was cool and sexy in a way it hadn&#8217;t been for decades, and people who were into it started to get respect rather than (or in addition to) faint or not-so-faint scorn.</p>
<p>You could see the trend in movies.  <cite>War Games</cite> in 1983; <cite>Revenge of the Nerds</cite> in 1984; <cite>Real Genius</cite> in 1985.  To kids today <cite>Revenge of the Nerds</cite> doesn&#8217;t seem remarkable, because geek culture is more secure and confident today than a lot of older tribes like bikers or hippies.  But at the time, the idea that you could have an entire <em>fraternity</em> of geeks &mdash; an autonomous social group with reason to be proud of itself and a recognized place in the social ecology &mdash; was <em>funny</em>; all by itself it was a comedy premise.</p>
<p>The heroes of <cite>Revenge of the Nerds</cite> were people who created a fraternity of their own, who bootstrapped a niche for themselves in Grant McCracken&#8217;s culture of plenitude.  The movie was an extended joke, but it described and perhaps helped create a real phenomenon.</p>
<p>The term &#8216;geek&#8217; didn&#8217;t emerge as a common label, displacing the older and much more sporadically-used &#8216;nerd&#8217;, until around the time of the Internet explosion of 1993-1994.  I noticed this development because I didn&#8217;t like it; I still prefer to tell people I hang out with hackers (all hackers are geeks, but not all geeks are hackers). Another index of the success of the emerging geek culture is that around that time it stopped being an almost exclusively male phenomenon.</p>
<p>Yes, you catch my implication.  When I was growing up we didn&#8217;t <em>have</em> geekgirls. Even if the label &#8216;geek&#8217; had been in use at the time, the idea that women could be so into computers or games or math that they would identify with and hang out with geek guys would have struck us as sheerest fantasy. Even the small minority of geek guys who were <em>good</em> with women (and thus had much less reason to consider them an alien species) would have found the implications of the term &#8216;geekgirl&#8217; unbelievable before 1995 or so.</p>
<p>(There are people who cannot read an account like the above without assuming that the author is simply projecting his own social and sexual isolation onto others.  For the benefit of those people, I will report here that I had good relations with women long before this was anything but rare in my peer group.  This only made the isolation of my peers easier to notice.)</p>
<p>What changed?  Several things.  One is that geek guys are, on the whole, better adjusted and healthier and more presentable today than they were when I was a teenager. Kids today have trouble believing the amount of negative social pressure on intelligent people to pass as normal and boring that was typical before 1980, the situation <cite>Revenge of the Nerds</cite> satirized and inverted.  It meant that the nascent geek culture of the time attracted only the most extreme geniuses and misfits &mdash; freaks, borderline autists, obsessives, and other people in reaction against the mainstream. Women generally looked at this and went &#8220;ugh!&#8221;</p>
<p>But over time, geeky interests became more respectable, even high-status (thanks at least in part to the public spectacle of &uuml;bergeeks making millions).  The whole notion of opposition to the mainstream started to seem dated as &#8216;mainstream&#8217; culture gradually effloresced into dozens of tribes freakier than geeks (two words: &#8220;body piercings&#8221;).  Thus we started to attract people who were more normal, in psychology if not in talent.  Women noticed this.  I believe it was in 1992, at a transhumanist party in California, that I first heard a woman matter-of-factly describe the Internet hacker culture as &#8220;a source of good boyfriends&#8221;.  A few years after that we started to get a noticeable intake of women who wanted to become geeks themselves, as opposed to just sleeping with or living with geeks.</p>
<p>The loner/obsessive/perfectionist tendencies of your archetypal geek are rare in women, who are culturally encouraged (and perhaps instinct-wired) to value social support and conformity more.  Thus, women entering the geek subculture was a strong sign that it had joined the set of social identities that people think of as &#8216;normal&#8217;. This is still a very recent development; I can&#8217;t recall the term &#8216;geekgirl&#8217; being used at all before about 1998, and I don&#8217;t think it became commonly self-applied until 2000 or so.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the dot.com bust does not seem to have slowed down or discredited the geek subculture at all.  Websites like <a href='http://geekculture.com'>http://geekculture.com</a> and <a href='http://thinkgeek.com'>http://thinkgeek.com</a> do a flourishing business, successfully betting investment capital on the theory that there <em>is</em> in fact a common subculture or community embracing computer hackers, SF fans, strategy gamers, aficionados of logic puzzles, radio hams, and technology hobbyists of all sorts. Just the fact that a website can advertise <q>The World&#8217;s Coolest Propeller Beanies!</q> is indication of how far we&#8217;ve come.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve previously observed about one large and important geek subtribe, the Internet hackers, that when people join it they tend to retrospectively re-interpret their past and after a while find it difficult to remember that  they weren&#8217;t always part of this tribe.  I think something similar is true  of geeks in general; even those of us who lived through the emergence of geek culture have to struggle a bit to remember what it was like back when we were genuinely atomized outcasts in a culture that was dismissive and hostile.</p>
<p>There are even beginning to be geek families with evidence of generational transmission.  I know three generations of one, starting when two computer scientists married in the late 1960s, and had four kids in the 1970s; the kids have since produced a first grandchild who at age five shows every sign of becoming just as avid a gamer/hacker/SF-fan as his parents and grandparents.</p>
<p>Little Isaac, bless him, will grow up in a culture that, in its plenitude, offers lots of artifacts and events designed by and for people like him.  He will take the World Wide Web and the Sci-Fi Channel and Yugio and the Lord of the Rings movies and personal computers for granted.  He&#8217;ll probably never be spat on by a jock, and if he can&#8217;t find a girlfriend it will be because the geekgirls and geek groupies are dating other guys like him, rather than being nonexistent.</p>
<p>For Isaac, <cite>Revenge of the Nerds</cite> will be a quaint period piece with very little more relevance to the social circumstances of his life than a Regency romance. And that is how we know that the nerds indeed got their revenge.</p>
