18 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
18 lines
2.5 KiB
Plaintext
Utter IDiots
|
|
<p>Leon H. at RedState writes in <a href='http://www.redstate.org/story/2005/12/21/113454/58'> Intelligent Design (The Debate Isn’t Helping)</a>:</p>
|
|
<blockquote><p>
|
|
In other words, my feeling about Krauthammer, Derbyshire, et al is<br />
|
|
basically this: if you wish to denigrate ID and insult its proponents,<br />
|
|
go find an ID discussion board (they are legion) and do so there –<br />
|
|
don’t use the pages of NR or your token space in the WaPo to do it<br />
|
|
in. What possible benefit to the cause of conservatism could come<br />
|
|
about by you propounding your opinion on a topic which is neither your<br />
|
|
calling nor your area of expertise, and which will insult a<br />
|
|
significant portion of the Republican coalition?
|
|
</p></blockquote>
|
|
<p>What a load of disingenuous crap this is!</p>
|
|
<p>I’m not a conservative, myself, and dislike conservatism for many reasons that I have <a href='http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=153'>written about elsewhere</a>. But I can sympathize with conservatives who desire to put distance between themselves and the ID movement, which combines purblind stupidity with dishonesty about its actual aims in a way I’ve previously only seen in gun-control proponents.</p>
|
|
<p>The ID movement’s claim that it’s not about end-running the First Amendment and turning schools into instruments for the propagation of Christian dogma is <em>just</em> as transparently specious as most gun-grabbers’ claims that they don’t aim to render the Second Amendment a dead letter. Both gangs are enemies of liberty and the U.S. Constitution, and for precisely the same reasons. It’s hardly startling for anyone, conservative or otherwise, to want to avoid being associated with any movement that lies wholesale about its objectives.</p>
|
|
<p>And that’s before addressing the numerous gaping logical holes in the “intelligent design” argument. U.S. District Court Judge John E. Jones, deciding Kitzmiller vs. Dover on December 20th, nailed many of these in his <a href='http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/educate/ktzmllrdvr122005opn.pdf'>opinion</a>. To actually buy the ID argument requires either a complete inability to do critical thinking or a zealot’s refusal to exercise it.</p>
|
|
<p>“What possible benefit to the cause of conservatism” he asks. Maybe…just maybe…Krauthammer and Derbyshire would like to demonstrate that there are some conservatives who are neither liars, religious zealots, nor plain-and-simple idiots.</p>
|