6 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
6 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
Copenhagen Conference Crashes
|
|
<p>Well, it’s happened. The Copenhagen climate conference has concluded with a three-page fig-leaf over its naked failure that even the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/19/science/earth/19climate.html?_r=1">can’t spin as good news for the AGW alarmists</a>. It’s kind of entertaining to watch them try, actually, but the glum tone of the report is palpable.</p>
|
|
<p>The best laugh line from the article is that President Obama left before the vote on the document because he wanted to get back to Washington <em>ahead of a major snowstorm</em>. Yeah, I know, weather not climate, but it’s still funny. Good thing Al Gore cancelled or they’d probably be trying to <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/04/the-gore-effect/">dig out from under record accumulation</a>.</p>
|
|
<p>I won’t say this was the <em>best</em> possible outcome from Copenhagen; the best possible outcome would have been an outright PR disaster that wrecked the careers of everyone even remotely connected with this boondoggle. And yes, on a sane planet the fact that they invited Robert Mugabe, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hugo Chavez to speak would have <em>been</em> that PR disaster; cripes, were they trying for the thug-tyrant trifecta? But having all that sound and fury add up to a big fat nothing is excellent.</p>
|
|
<p>It’s excellent because, by the time the kleptocrat gang at the UN can wind up for another try, the likelihood is that the “scientific” support for their AGW scam will have been entirely exposed as a tissue of fraud. That’s the way things seem to be heading, anyway. Faster, please!</p>
|