This repository has been archived on 2017-04-03. You can view files and clone it, but cannot push or open issues/pull-requests.
blog_post_tests/20100706195102.blog

9 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext

Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality
<p>Oh Thoth Trismegistus, oh Ma&#8217;at, oh Ganesha, oh sweet lady Eris&#8230;I have not laughed so hard in years!</p>
<p>Eliezer Yudkowsky is one of the brightest people I&#8217;ve ever met in a lifetime of seeking out gifted- to genius-grade thinkers because people who aren&#8217;t usually bore me pretty quickly. Eliezer has spent years studying the deep structure of rationality and probably understands the systematic sources of bias and irrationality in the shared architecture of the human mind as comprehensively as anyone alive. I have <a href="http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=1068">previously commented</a> on some of his writings.</p>
<p>Usually Eliezer thinks about questions like how to build human-compatible ethical reasoning into AIs. Serious, deep stuff. When he turns the vast and imponderable force of his intellect to writing, of all things, <em>Harry Potter fanfic</em>, a quite unexpected degree of hilarity ensues. </p>
<p><span id="more-2100"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1/Harry_Potter_and_the_Methods_of_Rationality">Read it</a> and laugh. Read it and learn. Eliezer re-invents Harry Potter as a skeptic genius who sets himself the task of figuring out just how all this &#8220;magic&#8221; stuff works. The science is real &#8211; it really would be a lot harder to explain transformation from a human into a cat than mere levitation, for example. When Harry, confronted with a magical time-travel device, is immediately terrified that he might be holding an antimatter bomb, this is actually a more justified fear than many readers may understand.</p>
<p>But the characters are not slighted. Eliezer is very good at giving them responses to the rather altered and powered-up Harry that are consistent with canon. The development of Minerva McGonagall is particularly fine.</p>
<p>Strongly recommended. And if you manage to learn about sources of cognitive bias like the Planning Fallacy and the Bystander Effect (among others) while your sides are hurting with laughter, so much the better.</p>