9 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
9 lines
1.5 KiB
Plaintext
Causes and implications of the pause
|
|
<p>That is the title of a <a href="http://judithcurry.com/2014/03/04/causes-and-implications-of-the-pause/">paper</a> attempting to explain (away) the 17-year nothing that happened while CAGW models were predicting warming driven by increasing CO2. CO2 increased. Measured GAT did not.</p>
|
|
<p>Here’s the money quote: “The most recent climate model simulations used in the AR5 indicate that the warming stagnation since 1998 is no longer consistent with model projections even at the 2% confidence level.”</p>
|
|
<p>That is an establishment climatologist’s cautious scientist-speak for “The IPCC’s anthropogenic-global-warming models are fatally broken. Kaput. Busted.”</p>
|
|
<p>I told you so. I told you so. I told you so!</p>
|
|
<p>I even predicted it would happen this year, yesterday on my Ask Me Anything on Slashdot. This wasn’t actually brave of me: the Economist noticed that the GAT trend was about to fall to worse than 5% fit to the IPCC models six months ago.</p>
|
|
<p>Here is my next prediction – and remember, I have been <em>consistently</em> right about these. The next phase of the comedy will feature increasingly frantic attempts to bolt epicycles onto the models. These epicycles will have names like “ENSO”, “standing wave” and “Atlantic Oscillation”. </p>
|
|
<p>All these attempts will <em>fail</em>, both predictively and retrodictively. It’s junk science all the way down.</p>
|